%% You should probably cite rfc8889 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark/08/},
    author =    {Giuseppe Fioccola and Mauro Cociglio and Amedeo Sapio and Riccardo Sisto},
    title =     {{Multipoint Alternate Marking method for passive and hybrid performance monitoring}},
    pagetotal = 24,
    year =      2020,
    month =     mar,
    day =       17,
    abstract =  {The Alternate Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can be applied only to point-to-point flows because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flows, whose packets can follow several different paths in the network, in wider terms a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason the technique here described is called Multipoint Alternate Marking.},
}