Skip to main content

Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with Hybrid Types In-Between)
draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-06

Yes

(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)

No Objection

(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Ben Campbell)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2016-01-20 for -05) Unknown
Nice document, thanks.
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -05) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -05) Unknown

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-01-19 for -05) Unknown
Just a nit..   Section 3. (Terms and Definitions) says that the “definitions are consistent with [I-D.zheng-ippm-framework-passive].”  Shouldn’t it be the other way around?
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05) Unknown

                            
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-01-06 for -05) Unknown
I had the explain the differences and pros/cons of active/passive so many times...
Now I can simply refer to this document. Thanks Al.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05) Unknown

                            
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -05) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-01-21 for -05) Unknown
Jouni Korhonen performed the opsdir review

Summary: Ready with issues

Major:    None.

Minor:

* The IDnits gives a comment but the outdated reference can be corrected at any time seen appropriate.

* Line 412:  expand DSCP on the first use.

* Lines 413-414: there is no closing ")".

* Lines 491-494: I find a discussion about IPR converage in this I-D somewhat odd. Specifically because there are no hard facts i.e., "..may be covered.." Maybe it is just me and if the WG has agree to have such text there I have no problem with it.


- Jouni
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-01-21 for -05) Unknown
4.3: would it be worth noting (here or elsewhere) that
this seems to be a hard thing to do with non-e2e ciphertext,
e.g. part way along a VPN path
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-01-18 for -05) Unknown
Thanks for writing this! Its a very useful reference. Especially the discussion/examples section.