%% You should probably cite rfc8468 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-01,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6/01/},
    author =    {Al Morton and Joachim Fabini and Nalini Elkins and michael ackermann and Vinayak Hegde},
    title =     {{IPv6 Updates for IPPM's Active Metric Framework}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2017,
    month =     mar,
    day =       6,
    abstract =  {This memo updates the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Framework RFC 2330 with new considerations for measurement methodology and testing. It updates the definition of standard-formed packets in RFC 2330 to include IPv6 packets and augments distinguishing aspects of packets, referred to as Type-P for test packets in RFC 2330. This memo identifies that IPv4-IPv6 co-existence can challenge measurements within the scope of the IPPM Framework. Exemplary use cases include, but are not limited to IPv4-IPv6 translation, NAT, protocol encapsulation, or IPv6 header compression.},
}