Skip to main content

Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM)
draft-ietf-impp-im-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-08-23
04 (System) This was part of a ballot set with: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt, draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf, draft-ietf-impp-pres, draft-ietf-impp-srv
2004-08-23
04 (System) Ballot has been issued
2004-08-23
04 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2004-08-23
04 (System) [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Hardie
2004-08-23
04 (System) Created "Approve" ballot
2003-10-31
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2003-10-29
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2003-10-29
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2003-10-29
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2003-10-29
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2003-10-29
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-10-29
04 (System) Last call text was added
2003-10-29
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-10-29
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Amy Vezza
2003-10-22
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-impp-im-04.txt
2003-09-22
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-09-22
04 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-09-18 by Amy Vezza
2003-09-18
04 Bill Fenner
The RFC-Editor note doesn't address two of my comments:
- One of the UCS-high definitions uses non-ABNF syntax (this is arguably a flaw in ABNF) …
The RFC-Editor note doesn't address two of my comments:
- One of the UCS-high definitions uses non-ABNF syntax (this is arguably a flaw in ABNF)
- The use of a modified case-sensitive ABNF

I'm willing to discuss the importance of these and will defer my concerns if the rest of the IESG is OK.
2003-09-12
04 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed by Ted Hardie
2003-09-12
04 Ted Hardie Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-09-18 by Ted Hardie
2003-09-12
04 Ted Hardie
draft RFC-editor note for draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt-08:

Section 3.6:


(substituting '%x' for '%' throughout NAMECHAR)
OLD:

                  ; …
draft RFC-editor note for draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt-08:

Section 3.6:


(substituting '%x' for '%' throughout NAMECHAR)
OLD:

                  ; Any US-ASCII char except ".", CTLs or SEPARATORS:
      NAMECHAR    = %21 / %23-27 / %2a-2b / %2d / %5e-60 / %7c / %7e
                  / ALPHA / DIGIT

NEW:

                  ; Any US-ASCII char except ".", CTLs or SEPARATORS:
      NAMECHAR    = %x21 / %x23-27 / %x2a-2b / %x2d / %x5e-60 / %x7c / %x7e
                  / ALPHA / DIGIT

(changing '<">' to '%x22' in SEPARATORS)
OLD:


      SEPARATORS  = "(" / ")" / "<" / ">" / "@"    ; 28/29/3c/3e/40
                  / "," / ";" / ":" / "" / <">    ; 2c/3b/3a/5c/22
                  / "/" / "[" / "]" / "?" / "="    ; 2f/5b/5d/3f/3d
                  / "{" / "}" / SP                ; 7b/7d/20

NEW:


      SEPARATORS  = "(" / ")" / "<" / ">" / "@"    ; 28/29/3c/3e/40
                  / "," / ";" / ":" / "" / %x22    ; 2c/3b/3a/5c/22
                  / "/" / "[" / "]" / "?" / "="    ; 2f/5b/5d/3f/3d
                  / "{" / "}" / SP                ; 7b/7d/20

Section 4.5:

(capitalizing 'lang-param')
OLD:

      Subject-header = "Subject" ":" [ ";" lang-param ] SP *HEADERCHAR

NEW:

      Subject-header = "Subject" ":" [ ";" Lang-param ] SP *HEADERCHAR
                                          ^^
2003-08-11
04 Michael Lee Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-08-07 by Michael Lee
2003-08-07
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-08-06
04 Margaret Cullen
The abstract and first section both say that "Today...little interperability...has been achieved."  While that's probably true _today_, is that really something that we want to …
The abstract and first section both say that "Today...little interperability...has been achieved."  While that's probably true _today_, is that really something that we want to say at the top of a standard that will hopefully live for many years?
2003-07-24
04 Michael Lee State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Lee, Michael
2003-06-16
04 Amy Vezza Status date has been changed to 2003-6-27 from
2003-06-16
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Publication Requested by Vezza, Amy
2003-06-13
04 (System) Last call sent
2003-05-22
04 Ted Hardie State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Hardie, Ted
2003-05-20
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-impp-im-03.txt
2003-03-25
04 Ted Hardie Draft Added by Hardie, Ted
2003-03-07
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-impp-im-02.txt
2002-12-06
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-impp-im-01.txt
2002-10-29
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-impp-im-00.txt