%% You should probably cite rfc8955 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27, number = {draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/27/}, author = {Christoph Loibl and Susan Hares and Robert Raszuk and Danny R. McPherson and Martin Bacher}, title = {{Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules}}, pagetotal = 36, year = 2020, month = oct, day = 15, abstract = {This document defines a Border Gateway Protocol Network Layer Reachability Information (BGP NLRI) encoding format that can be used to distribute (intra-domain and inter-domain) traffic Flow Specifications for IPv4 unicast and IPv4 BGP/MPLS VPN services. This allows the routing system to propagate information regarding more specific components of the traffic aggregate defined by an IP destination prefix. It also specifies BGP Extended Community encoding formats, which can be used to propagate Traffic Filtering Actions along with the Flow Specification NLRI. Those Traffic Filtering Actions encode actions a routing system can take if the packet matches the Flow Specification. This document obsoletes both RFC 5575 and RFC 7674.}, }