%% You should probably cite rfc9104 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-idr-eag-distribution-10,
    number =    {draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution/10/},
    author =    {Zitao Wang and Qin Wu and Jeff Tantsura and Ketan Talaulikar},
    title =     {{Distribution of MPLS-TE Extended
    admin Group Using BGP-LS}},
    pagetotal = 6,
    year =      ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **,
    month =     ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **,
    day =       ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **,
    abstract =  {Administrative groups (commonly referred to as "colors" or "link colors") are link attributes that are advertised by link state protocols like IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) and OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and used for traffic engineering. These administrative groups have initially been defined as a fixed- length 32-bit bitmask. As networks grew and more use-cases were introduced, the 32-bit length was found to be constraining and hence extended administrative groups were introduced in the link state protocols. The 32-bit administrative groups are already advertised as link attributes in BGP-LS. This document introduces extensions to BGP-LS (Border Gateway Protocol Link-State) for advertisement of the extended administrative groups.},
}