Discussion of the IASA 2.0 Changes as They Relate to the IETF Trust

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Ben Campbell) Yes

Comment (2018-10-10 for -02)
Thanks for this. I have one minor non-comment:

§3, last paragraph: "... the IETF Trust is a low-activity entity where changes are minimal and gradual, and there are no pressing issues."

Sure, taunt the universe.  :-)

Alissa Cooper Yes

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

Comment (2018-10-10 for -02)
I really appreciate this work. As Leslie said, one of these days, we're not going to be able to ask her to archive-dive about decisions that happened a decade in the past, and having this written down if we need it is valuable.

Benjamin Kaduk Yes

Comment (2018-10-10 for -02)
Thank you for deciding to publish this rationale document; it's a good piece of text
to have in an easy to find location.  My only comments are editorial nitpicking.

Section 4

   Given all this, one approach was to have trustees appointed by the
   NomCom, IESG, and ISOC Board of Trustees, or even the new IETF
   Administration LLC legal entity (but the Internet Society is perhaps
   more focused on the broad use of the IETF Trust assets and not merely
   administrative aspects).

nit: it's a bit unclear to me what the "but" in the parenthetical is
contrasting to.  Are we considering (ISOC BoT vs. IETF LLC) as picking one
of the trustees (with the NomCom and IESG picking the rest)?

Section 5

   And once the updated procedures were in place, the IETF Trust has its
   management nominated in the usual manner, and the exceptional IESG
   process is no longer needed.

nit: is there a past/present mismatch between "were" and "has"/"is"?

Adam Roach Yes

Comment (2018-10-08 for -02)

>  At the time RFC NNNN was published, IETF administrative structure
>  changes ("IASA 2.0") had an impact on the IETF Trust because members
>  of the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) IAOC

Nit: "(IAOC) IAOC" seems redundant.

Ignas Bagdonas No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

Comment (2018-10-10 for -02)
I really don't understand why this is published in a separate doc instead of just putting it in the appendix of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

(Eric Rescorla) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection