Update to the IETF Anti-Harassment Procedures for the Replacement of the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) with the IETF Administration LLC
draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-03
Yes
(Alissa Cooper)
No Objection
(Adam Roach)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Ignas Bagdonas)
(Martin Vigoureux)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Warren Kumari
Yes
Comment
(2019-09-03 for -02)
Not sent
I must admit that I also find the OLD / NEW less than easy to read -- however I believe that this is the appropriate / best mechanism to use in this particular case.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2019-09-04 for -02)
Sent
(1) +1 on Barry Leiba’s COMMENT about updating meta-data (2) A few nits: -- Multiple places. Typo. s/Adminstrative/Administrative/g -- Section 2.3. Consistent spacing/typo. s/obmudsteam/Ombudsteam/.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2019-08-21 for -02)
Sent
I have to say that I find the changes to the metadata stuff to be odd and confusing, and would have preferred that 7776bis completely replace 7776 instead of trying to update it. No action nor response needed here... just wishing it had been handled differently. Typo: “contained updated” should be “contained updates” in both the Abstract and Introduction.
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-08-26 for -02)
Not sent
+1 to Barry’s comment, I found it to be very confusing as well.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-09-05 for -02)
Sent
Thanks for the discussion about what we mean when we request to
update the metadata ("Updates:) headers.
It's also not entirely clear to me that we need to Update 7776 to remove
the references to its updating of 7437, since
RFC-7776-the-immutable-artifact does/did indeed update 7437; it's just
that 7437 itself is no longer current/relevant.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Ignas Bagdonas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-09-05 for -02)
Sent
I have cleared but the path to this document needs to be furthered discussed and also the next steps to consolidate the documents.
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Not sent
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-08-28 for -02)
Sent
While I understand why this approach was taken, I have to at least say that I find the OLD/NEW style in section 2.3 not very helpful. Just explaining the change in words would probably have been enough and less confusing.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-09-04 for -02)
Sent
Agree with Benjamin's DISCUSS. I think the "Updates: 7437" is an immutable part of RFC7776 and it must not be changed.