%% You should probably cite rfc9069 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-02, number = {draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib/02/}, author = {Tim Evens and Serpil Bayraktar and Manish Bhardwaj and Paolo Lucente}, title = {{Support for Local RIB in BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)}}, pagetotal = 14, year = 2018, month = sep, day = 17, abstract = {The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) defines access to the Adj-RIB-In and locally originated routes (e.g. routes distributed into BGP from protocols such as static) but not access to the BGP instance Loc-RIB. This document updates the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) RFC 7854 by adding access to the BGP instance Local-RIB, as defined in RFC 4271 the routes that have been selected by the local BGP speaker's Decision Process. These are the routes over all peers, locally originated, and after best-path selection.}, }