Graceful BGP Session Shutdown
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13
Yes
Warren Kumari
(Alvaro Retana)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Warren Kumari
Yes
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2017-12-18)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
(2017-12-13 for -12)
Unknown
I'm balloting "yes" because I think it's important to publish this. But, like Alvaro, I wonder why this is not standards track, BCP, or just about anything but informational. So I support his DISCUSS, including his the comments on how to resolve it. -1, last paragraph: This references RFC 8174, but does not use the actual 8174 boilerplate. Is there a reason not to do so?
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-12-14 for -12)
Unknown
I also believe this should be standards track. Or is there any good reason why it should not be standards track similar as other docs that define well known communities?
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -12)
Unknown