Location Information Server (LIS) Discovery Using IP Addresses and Reverse DNS
draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-08

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
08 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The residential gateway is a device that has become an integral part of home networking equipment. …
2015-10-14
08 (System) Notify list changed from geopriv-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery@ietf.org to (None)
2014-04-29
08 (System) RFC published
2014-04-22
08 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2014-04-11
08 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2014-03-20
08 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2014-01-28
08 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2014-01-28
08 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2014-01-28
08 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2014-01-27
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2014-01-27
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2014-01-27
08 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2014-01-27
08 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2014-01-27
08 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2014-01-27
08 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2014-01-27
08 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2014-01-27
08 Richard Barnes State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2014-01-27
08 Richard Barnes Ballot writeup was changed
2014-01-24
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Discussion of my discuss I think resolved down to the point that
a client doing this will send out a DNS query that …
2014-01-24
08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-01-23
08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-01-05
08 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
The document authors have updated the document to clarify the main point I was concerned about, and have further explained why they think …
2014-01-05
08 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-01-05
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Just noting that -08 doesn't address this. Sent some mail.

Where'd my DISCUSS go? :-)

I'm not sure if this still applies or …
2014-01-05
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's discuss. I would further note that
pretty much every geopriv dfaft seems to get a "this is
pretending to …
2014-01-05
08 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2013-12-18
08 Martin Thomson IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2013-12-18
08 Martin Thomson New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-08.txt
2013-12-12
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call (ends 2013-12-12)
2013-12-10
07 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Nevil Brownlee.
2013-12-10
07 Peter Yee Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Peter Yee.
2013-12-09
07 Amanda Baber
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any …
2013-12-05
07 Gunter Van de Velde Assignment of request for Telechat review by OPSDIR to Scott Bradner was rejected
2013-12-05
07 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <geopriv@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07.txt> …
2013-12-05
07 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call (ends 2013-11-18) from Last Call Requested
2013-12-05
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-12-05
07 Richard Barnes Last call was requested
2013-12-05
07 Richard Barnes State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation
2013-12-05
07 Richard Barnes Last call announcement was changed
2013-12-05
07 Richard Barnes Last call announcement was generated
2013-12-05
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

Where'd my DISCUSS go? :-)

I'm not sure if this still applies or not, but I'll whack it back in
at least temporarily. …
2013-12-05
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

I agree with Adrian's discuss. I would further note that
pretty much every geopriv dfaft seems to get a "this is
pretending to …
2013-12-05
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-12-04
07 Richard Barnes Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2013-12-04
07 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-12-04
07 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-12-04
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for Section 6. I find it addresses the Discuss I would have entered.
2013-12-04
07 Adrian Farrel Ballot comment text updated for Adrian Farrel
2013-12-04
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-12-03
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-12-03
07 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-12-03
07 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
Jari is holding the discuss about the change of the status after the IETF LC. The doc is saying standards track but the …
2013-12-03
07 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-12-02
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I'm probably missing something obvious, but as far as I can tell, the document was last called (twice) with intended status set to …
2013-12-02
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
Peter Yee's Gen-ART review comments were addressed. Thanks!
2013-12-02
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-12-02
07 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2013-12-02
07 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2013-12-02
07 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot comment]
cleared my previous dicuss on 5 so I think I can llive with it as written
2013-12-02
07 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-12-02
07 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I am balloting No-Obj based on the premise that the -07 version resolves the DISCUSS points I raised against the -05 version.
2013-12-02
07 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-12-01
07 Richard Barnes Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from Informational
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
In 4.1, paragraph three mentions UPnP and NAT-PMP, but doesn't mention Port Control Protocol (PCP), RFC 6887.  Given that PCP is the only …
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
In 4.1, paragraph three mentions UPnP and NAT-PMP, but doesn't mention Port Control Protocol (PCP), RFC 6887.  Given that PCP is the only …
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon Ballot comment text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
(1) This specification relies on home gateways not following RFC 6303.  Some of the advice given in the spec will simply fail if …
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
In 4.1, paragraph three mentions UPnP and NAT-PMP, but doesn't mention Port Control Protocol (PCP), RFC 6887.  Given that PCP is the only …
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Ted Lemon
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon
[Ballot discuss]
(1) This specification relies on home gateways not following RFC 6303.  Some of the advice given in the spec will simply fail if …
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
What's the IETF consensus status of this document?  It's set to Unknown.

In 4.1, paragraph three mentions UPnP and NAT-PMP, but doesn't mention …
2013-12-01
07 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-11-30
07 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-11-29
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-11-25
07 Cindy Morgan Created "Approve" ballot
2013-11-25
07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-11-22
07 Richard Barnes State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-11-22
07 Richard Barnes Telechat date has been changed to 2013-12-05 from 2013-08-29
2013-11-22
07 Richard Barnes Ballot has been issued
2013-11-18
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call (ends 2013-11-18)
2013-11-13
07 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2013-11-13
07 Amanda Baber
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any …
2013-11-11
07 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Nevil Brownlee
2013-11-11
07 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Nevil Brownlee
2013-11-08
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Peter Yee
2013-11-08
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Peter Yee
2013-11-04
07 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <geopriv@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07.txt> …
2013-11-04
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call (ends 2013-07-31) from Last Call Requested
2013-11-04
07 Cindy Morgan Last call announcement was generated
2013-11-04
07 Richard Barnes Last call was requested
2013-11-04
07 Richard Barnes State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2013-11-04
07 Martin Thomson New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-07.txt
2013-09-09
06 Richard Barnes Moving to AD Eval pending changes, WG review, and re-LC
2013-09-09
06 Richard Barnes State changed to AD Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-09-07
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The authors have added some very good privacy text to this document, and I thank them for that.

However, their work is predicated …
2013-09-07
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2013-09-06
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-09-06
06 Martin Thomson IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed
2013-09-06
06 Martin Thomson New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-06.txt
2013-08-29
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-08-29
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
aside: I wonder what the average number of discusses for a geopriv draft is.

From the secdir review:

The authors mention that RFC …
2013-08-29
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-08-29
05 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-08-29
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-08-28
05 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
I disagree with the WG's assessment that this is an Informational document. Section 4.2 is protocol. This document specifies a series of queries …
2013-08-28
05 Pete Resnick Ballot discuss text updated for Pete Resnick
2013-08-28
05 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
I disagree with the WG's assessment that this is an Information document. Section 4.2 is protocol. This document specifies a series of queries …
2013-08-28
05 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-08-28
05 Joel Jaeggli
[Ballot discuss]
first support adrian's dicuss and I do belive that it is discuss0-worthy by our current criterion...

Second I deeply concerned (though perhaps I …
2013-08-28
05 Joel Jaeggli Ballot discuss text updated for Joel Jaeggli
2013-08-28
05 Joel Jaeggli
[Ballot discuss]
first support stephen's dicuss and I do belive that it is discuss0-worthy by our current criterion...

Second I deeply concerned (though perhaps I …
2013-08-28
05 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-08-27
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

(1) I don't get how its hard to configure a LIS name/addr
but easy to configure a STUN server - can you explain? …
2013-08-27
05 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

I agree with Adrian's discuss. I would further note that
pretty much every geopriv dfaft seems to get a "this is
pretending to …
2013-08-27
05 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-08-27
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot discuss]
I agree with Adrian's discuss as I had the same concerns when reading the text.
2013-08-27
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-08-26
05 Amy Vezza Document shepherd changed to Alissa Cooper
2013-08-26
05 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]

1) This document rightly states that the approach documented is brittle and could possibly do more harm than good.  The right thing to …
2013-08-26
05 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I strongly support Adrian's point on this work.
2013-08-26
05 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-08-26
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-08-25
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I am raising this as a Discuss because I believe the issue needs more
debate amongst the IESG.  I acknowledge that I do …
2013-08-25
05 Adrian Farrel Ballot discuss text updated for Adrian Farrel
2013-08-25
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I am raising this as a Discuss because I believe the issue needs more
debate amongst the IESG.  I acknowledge that I do …
2013-08-25
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-08-25
05 Richard Barnes State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2013-08-25
05 Richard Barnes Ballot has been issued
2013-08-25
05 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-08-25
05 Richard Barnes Created "Approve" ballot
2013-08-22
05 Richard Barnes Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-08-29
2013-08-02
05 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Catherine Meadows.
2013-07-31
05 Peter Yee Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Peter Yee.
2013-07-31
05 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2013-07-23
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2013-07-23
05 Amanda Baber
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any …
2013-07-18
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Peter Yee
2013-07-18
05 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Peter Yee
2013-07-18
05 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows
2013-07-18
05 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows
2013-07-17
05 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2013-07-17
05 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <geopriv@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05.txt> …
2013-07-17
05 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Last call was requested
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes State changed to Last Call Requested from Last Call Requested
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Last call was requested
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes State changed to Last Call Requested from Last Call Requested
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Last call was requested
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Ballot approval text was generated
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Ballot writeup was changed
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Ballot writeup was generated
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Changed document writeup
2013-07-17
05 Richard Barnes Last call announcement was generated
2013-06-21
05 Richard Barnes State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2013-04-05
05 Cindy Morgan
1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2013-04-05
05 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Alissa Cooper (acooper@cdt.org) is the document shepherd.'
2013-04-05
05 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Informational
2013-04-05
05 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2013-04-05
05 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery
2013-04-05
05 Ray Bellis New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05.txt
2012-09-25
04 Ray Bellis New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04.txt
2012-03-29
03 Ray Bellis New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-03.txt
2011-09-12
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-02.txt
2011-03-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-01.txt
2011-01-31
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-00.txt