Requirements for a Working Group Charter Tool
draft-ietf-genarea-charter-tool-09
Yes
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2011-04-26)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-14)
Unknown
I support Dan's Discuss about Milestone changes. The ability to change milestones should be supported by the tool, and the history of those changes should be maintained.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-12)
Unknown
Section 3.1: I seem to remember that dashes also cause problems for some tools. It might be worth adding this to the note.
Sec 3.1: Has the following:
When moved to this state, a note is sent to the
Secretariat to send out the external review announcement to the
appropriate lists.
Are we envisioning a radio dial for "send email to new-work" ad "do not send email to new-work"? Not sure if we want this automated or not.
Sec 3.2: Do we want to allow the existing WG chairs to submit revised Charters and call it "Recharter Requested"?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown