IMAP Extension for STATUS=SIZE
draft-ietf-extra-imap-status-size-02
Yes
(Adam Roach)
(Alexey Melnikov)
No Objection
Warren Kumari
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Eric Rescorla)
(Ignas Bagdonas)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Adam Roach Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-06-06)
Unknown
§1, first sentence: Missing article before "Internet Message Access Protocol"
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-06-04)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ignas Bagdonas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-06-05)
Unknown
(Just as an aside - all the EXTRA drafts I'm reading this week are great examples of protocol extensions. I'm glad I balloted Yes to create the group!) I was somewhat confused by the first couple of sentences. This document extends Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) [IMAP4rev1] with a new capability called "STATUS=SIZE". To determine the total storage size of a mailbox, an IMAP client currently needs to retrieve all message sizes individually using the FETCH command with the RFC822.SIZE data item. Is the "total storage size of a mailbox" the "total size of all messages stored in a message store"? "Total storage size of a mailbox" seems more like a capacity number than a usage number. I see "total size of the mailbox" used in more than one place, but I think just the clarification on first use would be enough. And my apologies if everyone who has ever worked on IMAP knows what was meant ;-)
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2018-06-05)
Unknown
I am fine with the range being limited to the positive half of the signed 64 bit integer range, but I am not at all sure why this makes implementation any easier. Can you clarify? The message size is chosen to be at most 63 bits wide rather than 64 bits to make implementations on various platforms (such as Java) easier.
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown