%% You should probably cite rfc9191 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-emu-eaptlscert-07,
    number =    {draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert-07},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eaptlscert/07/},
    author =    {Mohit Sethi and John Preuß Mattsson and Sean Turner},
    title =     {{Handling Large Certificates and Long Certificate Chains in TLS-based EAP Methods}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      2020,
    month =     nov,
    day =       19,
    abstract =  {The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), defined in RFC3748, provides a standard mechanism for support of multiple authentication methods. EAP-Transport Layer Security (EAP-TLS) and other TLS-based EAP methods are widely deployed and used for network access authentication. Large certificates and long certificate chains combined with authenticators that drop an EAP session after only 40 - 50 round-trips is a major deployment problem. This document looks at this problem in detail and describes the potential solutions available.},
}