%% You should probably cite rfc9244 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dots-telemetry-25,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-25},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-telemetry/25/},
    author =    {Mohamed Boucadair and Tirumaleswar Reddy.K and Ehud Doron and Meiling Chen and Jon Shallow},
    title =     {{Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Telemetry}},
    pagetotal = 108,
    year =      2022,
    month =     mar,
    day =       21,
    abstract =  {This document aims to enrich the Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) signal channel protocol with various telemetry attributes, allowing for optimal Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack mitigation. It specifies the normal traffic baseline and attack traffic telemetry attributes a DOTS client can convey to its DOTS server in the mitigation request, the mitigation status telemetry attributes a DOTS server can communicate to a DOTS client, and the mitigation efficacy telemetry attributes a DOTS client can communicate to a DOTS server. The telemetry attributes can assist the mitigator in choosing the DDoS mitigation techniques and performing optimal DDoS attack mitigation. This document specifies two YANG modules: one for representing DOTS telemetry message types and one for sharing the attack mapping details over the DOTS data channel.},
}