%% You should probably cite rfc9132 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08, number = {draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis/08/}, author = {Mohamed Boucadair and Jon Shallow and Tirumaleswar Reddy.K}, title = {{Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification}}, pagetotal = 107, year = 2021, month = jun, day = 3, abstract = {This document specifies the Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) signal channel, a protocol for signaling the need for protection against Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks to a server capable of enabling network traffic mitigation on behalf of the requesting client. A companion document defines the DOTS data channel, a separate reliable communication layer for DOTS management and configuration purposes. This document obsoletes RFC 8782.}, }