%% You should probably cite rfc8783 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-dots-data-channel-28, number = {draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-28}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel/28/}, author = {Mohamed Boucadair and Tirumaleswar Reddy.K}, title = {{Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel Specification}}, pagetotal = 71, year = 2019, month = mar, day = 28, abstract = {The document specifies a Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) data channel used for bulk exchange of data that cannot easily or appropriately communicated through the DOTS signal channel under attack conditions. This is a companion document to the DOTS signal channel specification. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Please update these statements within the document with the RFC number to be assigned to this document: o "This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;" o "RFC XXXX: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel Specification"; o reference: RFC XXXX Please update the "revision" date of the YANG module.}, }