%% You should probably cite rfc8490 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dnsop-session-signal-19,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-19},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal/19/},
    author =    {Ray Bellis and Stuart Cheshire and John Dickinson and Sara Dickinson and Ted Lemon and Tom Pusateri},
    title =     {{DNS Stateful Operations}},
    pagetotal = 66,
    year =      ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **,
    month =     ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **,
    day =       ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **,
    abstract =  {This document defines a new DNS OPCODE for DNS Stateful Operations (DSO). DSO messages communicate operations within persistent stateful sessions, using type-length-value (TLV) syntax. Three TLVs are defined that manage session timeouts, termination, and encryption padding, and a framework is defined for extensions to enable new stateful operations. This document updates RFC 1035 by adding a new DNS header opcode which has different message semantics, and a new result code. This document updates RFC 7766 by redefining a session, providing new guidance on connection re-use, and providing a new mechanism for handling session idle timeouts.},
}