Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)
draft-ietf-dhc-vendor-03
Yes
(Bill Fenner)
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-07-08)
Unknown
This needs to have a normative reference to RFC 2939. I don't require this to be written, but one could write a stronger security consideration, something like that there's more need for the development of the mechanisms other than 3118 with this improved vendor extension mechanism.
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-07-08)
Unknown
I assume that instead of normative reference:
[3] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers",
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers.html>.
they actually meanL
[3] IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers",
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers>.
that is without the suffix: .html
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-07-08)
Unknown
It would be helpful if the numbering system base for the option values were specified. Are they supposed to be octal, decimal, or hexadecimal?
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown