%% You should probably cite rfc7550 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues/08/},
    author =    {Ole Trøan and Bernie Volz and Marcin Siodelski},
    title =     {{Issues and Recommendations with Multiple Stateful DHCPv6 Options}},
    pagetotal = 21,
    year =      2014,
    month =     oct,
    day =       22,
    abstract =  {Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) was not written with the expectation that additional stateful DHCPv6 options would be developed. IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6 shoe-horned the new options for Prefix Delegation into DHCPv6. Implementation experience of the CPE model described in RFC 7084 has shown multiple issues with the DHCPv6 protocol in supporting multiple stateful options. This document updates RFC 3315 and RFC 3633 to address the identified issues.},
}