%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design/03/},
    author =    {Tomek Mrugalski and Kim Kinnear},
    title =     {{DHCPv6 Failover Design}},
    pagetotal = 60,
    year =      2013,
    month =     jul,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {DHCPv6 defined in {[}RFC3315{]} does not offer server redundancy. This document defines a design for DHCPv6 failover, a mechanism for running two servers on the same network with capability for either server to take over clients' leases in case of server failure or network partition. This is a DHCPv6 Failover design document, it is not protocol specification document. It is a second document in a planned series of three documents. DHCPv6 failover requirements are specified in {[}I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-requirements{]}. A protocol specification document is planned to follow this document.},
}