Transport Northbound Interface Applicability Statement
draft-ietf-ccamp-transport-nbi-app-statement-01

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type None Internet-Draft (ccamp WG)
Last updated 2018-03-05
Replaces draft-ietf-ccamp-transport-nbi-use-cases
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Additional URLs
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state (None)
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Unknown state
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-transport-nbi-app-statement-01.txt

Abstract

Transport network domains, including Optical Transport Network (OTN) and Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) networks, are typically deployed based on a single vendor or technology platforms. They are often managed using proprietary interfaces to dedicated Element Management Systems (EMS), Network Management Systems (NMS) and increasingly Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers. A well-defined open interface to each domain management system or controller is required for network operators to facilitate control automation and orchestrate end-to-end services across multi-domain networks. These functions may be enabled using standardized data models (e.g. YANG), and appropriate protocol (e.g., RESTCONF). This document analyses the applicability of the YANG models being defined by IETF (TEAS and CCAMP WGs in particular) to support OTN single and multi-domain scenarios.

Authors

Italo Busi (italo.busi@huawei.com)
Daniel King (d.king@lancaster.ac.uk)
Haomian Zheng (zhenghaomian@huawei.com)
Yunbin Xu (xuyunbin@ritt.cn)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)