A Transport Network View of the Link Management Protocol (LMP)
draft-ietf-ccamp-transport-lmp-02
Yes
(Alex Zinin)
No Objection
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Ted Hardie)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-09-14)
Unknown
It is pretty late in the document before the reader learns which ITU-T Recommendations make up the "the ITU-T discovery work." I think this should be defined in the front of the document.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2005-09-14)
Unknown
This draft illustrates a major terminology confusion that we have between the IETF and the ITU-T. We use "transport" to mean Layer 4 transport protocols and issues. They use "transport" to mean, well, I don't know for sure, but it seems to mean "moving bits." I believe this terminology clash needs to be explained right at the beginning of this draft - even its title fooled me. Extreme example: in this draft, TCP means Termination Connection Point