Skip to main content

A Transport Network View of the Link Management Protocol (LMP)
draft-ietf-ccamp-transport-lmp-02

Yes

(Alex Zinin)

No Objection

(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Ted Hardie)

No Record


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Alex Zinin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2005-09-14) Unknown
  It is pretty late in the document before the reader learns which
  ITU-T Recommendations make up the "the ITU-T discovery work."  I
  think this should be defined in the front of the document.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Record
No Record (2005-09-14) Unknown
This draft illustrates a major terminology confusion that we have
between the IETF and the ITU-T.

We use "transport" to mean Layer 4 transport protocols and issues.

They use "transport" to mean, well, I don't know for sure,
but it seems to mean "moving bits."

I believe this terminology clash needs to be explained right at
the beginning of this draft - even its title fooled me.

Extreme example: in this draft, TCP means Termination Connection Point