Skip to main content

GMPLS Signaling Procedure for Egress Control
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-egress-control-03

Yes

(Alex Zinin)

No Objection

(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Thomas Narten)

No Record


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Alex Zinin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-09-16) Unknown
RFC2119 must be a normative reference.

References {BCP78] and [BCP79] do not have any citations in the text
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-09-16) Unknown
Reviewed by Scott Brim, Gen-ART
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-09-16) Unknown
Probably, the boilerplate 2119 terminology import statement belongs in its own terminology section, not as the 2nd paragraph of section 2, "Egress Control Procedures".
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2004-09-14) Unknown
  ERO and RRO should be explained before the quoted portion of
  RFC 3473.
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-09-10) Unknown
ERO is never defined.
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Record
No Record (2004-09-16) Unknown
With reference to the others' remarks:
to be consistent with how other specifications are treated by this esteemed body,
I hope that there will be an RFC Editor note for expanding the acronym and
information to the editor to be kinder to Readers