%% You should probably cite rfc4783 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-06,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec/06/},
    author =    {Lou Berger},
    title =     {{GMPLS - Communication of Alarm Information}},
    pagetotal = 19,
    year =      2006,
    month =     sep,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {This document describes an extension to Generalized MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) signaling to support communication of alarm information. GMPLS signaling already supports the control of alarm reporting, but not the communication of alarm information. This document presents both a functional description and GMPLS-RSVP specifics of such an extension. This document also proposes modification of the RSVP ERROR\_SPEC object. This document updates RFC 3473, "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", through the addition of new, optional protocol elements. It does not change, and is fully backward compatible with, the procedures specified in RFC 3473. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}