Usage and Applicability of BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-09
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2018-05-16
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2018-04-26
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2018-04-12
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2018-02-26
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2018-02-26
|
09 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2018-02-26
|
09 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2018-02-26
|
09 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2018-02-26
|
09 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2018-02-26
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2018-02-26
|
09 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2018-02-26
|
09 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2018-02-24
|
09 | Alvaro Retana | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup |
2018-02-24
|
09 | Alvaro Retana | Ballot approval text was generated |
2018-02-24
|
09 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2018-02-24
|
09 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-09.txt |
2018-02-24
|
09 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-02-24
|
09 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Senad Palislamovic , Jim Uttaro , Jorge Rabadan , Wim Henderickx , Ali Sajassi |
2018-02-24
|
09 | Jorge Rabadan | Uploaded new revision |
2018-02-22
|
08 | Sheng Jiang | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Sheng Jiang. Sent review to list. |
2018-02-22
|
08 | Jean Mahoney | Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'Team Will not Review Version' |
2018-02-22
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] §10: It would help if the security considerations talked about how the security considerations from 7432 apply to the scenarios in this document, … [Ballot comment] §10: It would help if the security considerations talked about how the security considerations from 7432 apply to the scenarios in this document, rather than just reference them. |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] Thanks for addressing the SecDir review. |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Warren Kumari | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari |
2018-02-21
|
08 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2018-02-20
|
08 | Jonathan Hardwick | Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Russ White. |
2018-02-19
|
08 | Amanda Baber | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2018-02-19
|
08 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2018-02-19
|
08 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2018-02-19
|
08 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot comment] Possible nit: sec 9.1.3: "It is worth noting that unless: a) control or management plane learning is performed through the entire EVI … [Ballot comment] Possible nit: sec 9.1.3: "It is worth noting that unless: a) control or management plane learning is performed through the entire EVI or b) all the EVI- attached devices signal their presence when they come up (GARPs or similar), unknown unicast flooding must be enabled." Is this "must be enabled" or "must not be enabled"? |
2018-02-19
|
08 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2018-02-16
|
08 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2018-02-16
|
08 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-08.txt |
2018-02-16
|
08 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-02-16
|
08 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Senad Palislamovic , Jim Uttaro , Jorge Rabadan , Wim Henderickx , Ali Sajassi |
2018-02-16
|
08 | Jorge Rabadan | Uploaded new revision |
2018-02-12
|
07 | Alvaro Retana | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2018-02-12
|
07 | Alvaro Retana | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2018-02-12
|
07 | Alvaro Retana | Ballot has been issued |
2018-02-12
|
07 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2018-02-12
|
07 | Alvaro Retana | Created "Approve" ballot |
2018-02-12
|
07 | Alvaro Retana | Ballot writeup was changed |
2018-02-09
|
07 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2018-02-08
|
07 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Stephen Kent. |
2018-02-08
|
07 | Roni Even | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Nits. Reviewer: Roni Even. Sent review to list. |
2018-02-02
|
07 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2018-02-02
|
07 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Services Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-06, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We … (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Services Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-06, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any registry actions. While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, we do not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal Senior IANA Services Specialist |
2018-02-01
|
07 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2018-02-01
|
07 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2018-01-31
|
07 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent |
2018-01-31
|
07 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent |
2018-01-31
|
07 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Sheng Jiang |
2018-01-31
|
07 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Sheng Jiang |
2018-01-29
|
07 | Min Ye | Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to Russ White |
2018-01-29
|
07 | Min Ye | Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to Russ White |
2018-01-29
|
07 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-07.txt |
2018-01-29
|
07 | (System) | New version approved |
2018-01-29
|
07 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Senad Palislamovic , Jim Uttaro , Jorge Rabadan , Wim Henderickx , Ali Sajassi |
2018-01-29
|
07 | Jorge Rabadan | Uploaded new revision |
2018-01-27
|
06 | Min Ye | Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to David Sinicrope |
2018-01-27
|
06 | Min Ye | Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to David Sinicrope |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2018-02-09): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage@ietf.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, aretana.ietf@gmail.com … The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2018-02-09): From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage@ietf.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, aretana.ietf@gmail.com Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN) to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG (bess) to consider the following document: - 'Usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-02-09. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document discusses the usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) in a simple and fairly common deployment scenario. The different EVPN procedures are explained on the example scenario, analyzing the benefits and trade-offs of each option. This document is intended to provide a simplified guide for the deployment of EVPN networks. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Requested Telechat review by RTGDIR |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2018-02-22 |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Last call was requested |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Ballot approval text was generated |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Ballot writeup was generated |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Last call announcement was generated |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | === AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-06 === https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/0aS4B_eOpxeyYlxgHSC4z68WNGw/?qid=4440bb42488445709fbbce5ab8bf4d5a Dear authors: Not much I can say about this document, except that it would have been nice if … === AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-06 === https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/0aS4B_eOpxeyYlxgHSC4z68WNGw/?qid=4440bb42488445709fbbce5ab8bf4d5a Dear authors: Not much I can say about this document, except that it would have been nice if it was published earlier to provide background to other EVPN document. Thanks for your work!! I just have a couple of comments on the references (see below). I am starting the IETF Last Call. Alvaro. R1. These references can be Informative: rfc4761, rfc4762, rfc6074 R2. There is no reference in the text to rfc4364, rfc7117 |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2018-01-26
|
06 | Alvaro Retana | Notification list changed to aretana.ietf@gmail.com |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Martin Vigoureux | As required by RFC 4858, this is the current template for the Document Shepherd Write-Up. Changes are expected over time. This version is dated … As required by RFC 4858, this is the current template for the Document Shepherd Write-Up. Changes are expected over time. This version is dated 24 February 2012. (1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? Is this type of RFC indicated in the title page header? This requested RFC type is Informational. This indicated in the header and is consistent with the body of the Document. The Document describes the use and some deployment considerations of EVPN technology. As such it provides valuable information to anyone willing to deploy and/or operate such technology. (2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary This document discusses the usage and applicability of BGP MPLS based Ethernet VPN (EVPN) in a simple and fairly common deployment scenario. The different EVPN procedures will be explained on the example scenario, analyzing the benefits and trade-offs of each option. This document is intended to provide a simplified guide for the deployment of EVPN in Service Provider networks. Working Group Summary The BESS WG support the publication of this Document as an Informational RFC Document Quality The Document is very well written and clear. There are multiple implementations of the EVPN technology. This Document describes in a very clear manner the use of the EVPN technology building blocks and components. As such it stands as a very valuable document to anyone wishing to deploy and operate EVPNs Personnel Martin Vigoureux is the Document Shepherd Alvaro Retana is the Responsible Area Director (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepherd. If this version of the document is not ready for publication, please explain why the document is being forwarded to the IESG. The Document Shepherd did a full review of the Document but found nearly nothing to comment on as the Document was already of a very good quality. (4) Does the document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No concern at all. (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the review that took place. No portion of the Document requires a review from a particular broader perspective. (6) Describe any specific concerns or issues that the Document Shepherd has with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. No specific concern or issue. (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why. All authors have reported not being aware of any undisclosed IPR pertaining to this Document. (8) Has an IPR disclosure been filed that references this document? If so, summarize any WG discussion and conclusion regarding the IPR disclosures. No IPR disclosure exists against this Document. (9) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? Consensus is really solid. (10) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is publicly available.) No such threat. (11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this document. (See https://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts Checklist). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. IDnits is nearly clean. There are a couple of references which were mistakenly left as Normative refs (RFC 4364 and RFC7117. They are not needed and should be removed by the RFC Editor. (12) Describe how the document meets any required formal review criteria, such as the MIB Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews. No formal review is required by this Document. (13) Have all references within this document been identified as either normative or informative? Yes. Yet, see ID-nits point above. (14) Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the plan for their completion? All Normative References are RFCs. (15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure. There is no Downward Normative Reference. (16) Will publication of this document change the status of any existing RFCs? Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? If the RFCs are not listed in the Abstract and Introduction, explain why, and point to the part of the document where the relationship of this document to the other RFCs is discussed. If this information is not in the document, explain why the WG considers it unnecessary. The publication of this Document will not change the status of any RFC. (17) Describe the Document Shepherd's review of the IANA considerations section, especially with regard to its consistency with the body of the document. Confirm that all protocol extensions that the document makes are associated with the appropriate reservations in IANA registries. Confirm that any referenced IANA registries have been clearly identified. Confirm that newly created IANA registries include a detailed specification of the initial contents for the registry, that allocations procedures for future registrations are defined, and a reasonable name for the new registry has been suggested (see RFC 5226). This Document makes no request to IANA. (18) List any new IANA registries that require Expert Review for future allocations. Provide any public guidance that the IESG would find useful in selecting the IANA Experts for these new registries. n/a (19) Describe reviews and automated checks performed by the Document Shepherd to validate sections of the document written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc. No section of the Document is written in a formal language. |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Martin Vigoureux | Responsible AD changed to Alvaro Retana |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Martin Vigoureux | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Martin Vigoureux | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Martin Vigoureux | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Martin Vigoureux | Changed document writeup |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-06.txt |
2017-08-28
|
06 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-08-28
|
06 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Senad Palislamovic , Jim Uttaro , Jorge Rabadan , Wim Henderickx , Ali Sajassi |
2017-08-28
|
06 | Jorge Rabadan | Uploaded new revision |
2017-08-17
|
05 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-05.txt |
2017-08-17
|
05 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-08-17
|
05 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Wim Henderickx , Aldrin Isaac , Keyur Patel , Senad Palislamovic , Jorge Rabadan , bess-chairs@ietf.org, … Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Wim Henderickx , Aldrin Isaac , Keyur Patel , Senad Palislamovic , Jorge Rabadan , bess-chairs@ietf.org, Ali Sajassi |
2017-08-17
|
05 | Jorge Rabadan | Uploaded new revision |
2017-08-03
|
04 | Martin Vigoureux | Changed document writeup |
2017-06-21
|
04 | Martin Vigoureux | Notification list changed to none from Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> |
2017-06-21
|
04 | Martin Vigoureux | Notification list changed to Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> |
2017-06-21
|
04 | Martin Vigoureux | Document shepherd changed to Martin Vigoureux |
2017-06-21
|
04 | Martin Vigoureux | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2017-06-06
|
04 | Martin Vigoureux | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2017-03-13
|
04 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04.txt |
2017-03-13
|
04 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-03-13
|
04 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Wim Henderickx , Keyur Patel , Senad Palislamovic , Jorge Rabadan , Aldrin Isaac , Ali Sajassi |
2017-03-13
|
04 | Jorge Rabadan | Uploaded new revision |
2016-09-19
|
03 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-03.txt |
2016-09-19
|
03 | Jorge Rabadan | New version approved |
2016-09-19
|
03 | Jorge Rabadan | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Jorge Rabadan" , "Aldrin Isaac" , "Senad Palislamovic" , "Keyur Patel" , "Ali Sajassi" , bess-chairs@ietf.org, … Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Jorge Rabadan" , "Aldrin Isaac" , "Senad Palislamovic" , "Keyur Patel" , "Ali Sajassi" , bess-chairs@ietf.org, "Wim Henderickx" |
2016-09-19
|
03 | (System) | Uploaded new revision |
2016-03-19
|
02 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-02.txt |
2015-07-04
|
01 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-01.txt |
2014-11-21
|
00 | Thomas Morin | Intended Status changed to Informational from None |
2014-11-20
|
00 | Thomas Morin | This document now replaces draft-rp-l2vpn-evpn-usage instead of None |
2014-11-13
|
00 | Jorge Rabadan | New version available: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-00.txt |