Babel Routing Protocol over Datagram Transport Layer Security
draft-ietf-babel-dtls-09

Summary: Has enough positions to pass.

Martin Vigoureux Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Roman Danyliw (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-27)
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSSes and COMMENTs.

Benjamin Kaduk (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-14)
Thank you for resolving my Discuss points!

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Mirja Kühlewind (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-14)
Thanks for discussing the port assignment (again)!

Barry Leiba No Objection

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2019-08-06 for -07)

Éric Vyncke No Objection

Comment (2019-08-05 for -07)
Thank you for the work put into this document. I have only two COMMENTs.

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Section 1.2 --

The text refers to the security consideration of RFC6121bis for an extended comparison of HMAC & DTLS except that there is no additional information in RFC 6121bis.

-- Section 2.1 --

It is a little unclear to me whether a mix of DTLS and non-DTLS Babel nodes can exist on the same layer-2 network. I guess no (as implied later) but a clear sentence would help.

Ignas Bagdonas No Record

Warren Kumari No Record

Adam Roach No Record

Magnus Westerlund No Record