Applicability of the Babel routing protocol
draft-ietf-babel-applicability-03

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (babel WG)
Last updated 2018-10-09 (latest revision 2018-04-07)
Replaces draft-chroboczek-babel-applicability
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Additional Resources
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
Document shepherd Donald Eastlake
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to "Donald Eastlake" <d3e3e3@gmail.com>

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-babel-applicability-03.txt

Abstract

Where we argue that, although OSPF and IS-IS are fine protocols, there exists a space where the Babel routing protocol (RFC 6126bis) is useful.

Authors

Juliusz Chroboczek (jch@irif.fr)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)