Skip to main content

Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension
draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-14

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, acme-chairs@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org, draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid@ietf.org, rdd@cert.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: Document Action: 'Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Delay-Tolerant
   Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension'
  (draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10.txt) as Experimental RFC

This document is the product of the Automated Certificate Management
Environment Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Paul Wouters and Roman Danyliw.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate
   Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to
   validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME
   client.  The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject
   Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of
   BundleEID and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID".

Working Group Summary

This document was developed in support of work in the DTN WG.  After WG review, an AD review surfaced an issue with the way in which the DTN ID was represented given the constraints of RFC5280 (July 2021).  This precipitated changes in the DTN specs and revision of this document.  After IETF LC, additional changes were made based on SECDIR review (Jan 2022) and due to additional developments in DTN (March 2022).  Confirmation that these changes had WG consensus was checked during IETF 114 and in another WGLC (Summer 2022).

Document Quality

There aren't any known implementations of this mechanism as of yet.

As the document points out:
| The emergent properties of DTN naming and BP security are still	
|  being developed and explored, especially between different	
|  organizational and administrative domains, so the	
|  "experimental" status of this document is related more to the	
|  practical utility of this kind of Node ID validation than to	
|  the validation method itself.

Personnel

Yoav Nir is the document shepherd. 

Roman Danyliw is the responsible Area Director.

RFC Editor Note