Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links
draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-01
Yes
(Jari Arkko)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-15)
Unknown
Section 6., paragraph 3: > a) Addresses with all zeros in the rightmost 64 bits SHOULD NOT be > assigned as unicast addresses, to avoid colliding with the Subnet- > Router anycast address [RFC4291]. > > b) Addresses in which the rightmost 64 bits are assigned the > highest 128 values, (i.e., ffff:ffff:ffff:ff7f to ffff:ffff:ffff: > ffff), SHOULD NOT be used as unicast addresses to avoid colliding > with Reserved Subnet Anycast Addresses [RFC2526]. Any reason these are not MUST NOTs?
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-14)
Unknown
Pedantic, editorial nits about this text from the introduction: address, except those that start with the binary value 000, s/address/addresses/ s/those/those unicast addresses/ (to clarify that "those" == addresses and not IIDs)
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-16)
Unknown
#1) Sec 3: s/does not apply/do not apply #2) Sec 5.1: s/which uses medium/which use a medium
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown