Packet Delivery Deadline time in 6LoWPAN Routing Header
draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2019-10-31
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to MISSREF from EDIT
2019-10-30
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT from MISSREF
2019-10-18
05 Bernie Volz Closed request for Early review by INTDIR with state 'Overtaken by Events'
2019-10-18
05 Bernie Volz Assignment of request for Early review by INTDIR to Donald Eastlake was marked no-response
2019-10-15
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2019-10-15
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2019-10-15
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2019-10-14
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2019-10-14
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on WGC
2019-10-10
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on WGC from In Progress
2019-10-10
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to MISSREF
2019-10-10
05 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2019-10-10
05 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2019-10-10
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2019-10-10
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2019-10-10
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2019-10-10
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2019-10-10
05 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2019-10-10
05 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2019-09-03
05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2019-08-29
05 Roman Danyliw
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS items

----
(2) Section 5.  Per the description of the D flag, how would a forwarding device “suspect ...
2019-08-29
05 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] Position for Roman Danyliw has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2019-08-26
05 Gunter Van de Velde Assignment of request for Last Call review by OPSDIR to Tianran Zhou was marked no-response
2019-08-01
05 Alissa Cooper [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENT.
2019-08-01
05 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alissa Cooper has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2019-07-08
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
The changes to the Security Considerations on version -05 address my concern about abuse of the deadline time.  Thanks for that, and I'm ...
2019-07-08
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2019-07-08
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2019-07-08
05 (System) IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2019-07-08
05 Charles Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt
2019-07-08
05 (System) New version approved
2019-07-08
05 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "S.V.R Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, Satish Anamalamudi <satishnaidu80@gmail.com>, Malati Hegde <malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, Charles Perkins <charliep@computer.org>
2019-07-08
05 Charles Perkins Uploaded new revision
2019-05-16
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2019-05-16
04 Roman Danyliw
[Ballot discuss]
I support Magnus’s DISCUSS #1 (and perhaps we are noting the same thing)

The current Security Considerations text needs explicit discussion of the ...
2019-05-16
04 Roman Danyliw
[Ballot comment]
(1) I also support Barry’s DISCUSS on the need to discuss what happens to a network where all senders have short deadlines

(2) ...
2019-05-16
04 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2019-05-16
04 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  There are multiple ways that a packet can be delayed, including
  queuing delay, MAC layer contention delay, serialization ...
2019-05-16
04 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2019-05-15
04 Warren Kumari
[Ballot comment]
Firstly, thank you very much for the:
"3.  6LoRHE Generic Format
  Note: this section is not normative and is included for convenience." ...
2019-05-15
04 Warren Kumari [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari
2019-05-15
04 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART reviewer made the following observation, which I'd like to discuss:

There is a serious problem with the last 5 paragraphs of ...
2019-05-15
04 Alissa Cooper [Ballot comment]
Please respond to the rest of the Gen-ART review.
2019-05-15
04 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2019-05-15
04 Éric Vyncke
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for the work everyone has put into this document. I have only a small number of comments and some nits.

Comments:
- ...
2019-05-15
04 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2019-05-15
04 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2019-05-15
04 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I have a few small points (one is confusing enough to warrant a quick discussion), but they affect clarity of the specification:

In ...
2019-05-15
04 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  There are multiple ways that a packet can be delayed, including
  queuing delay, MAC layer contention delay, serialization ...
2019-05-15
04 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2019-05-14
04 Adam Roach [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach
2019-05-13
04 Deborah Brungard
[Ballot comment]
Agree with others, it would be helpful to have more description on the context/use.

Mirja noted this sentence:
“The packet SHOULD be delivered ...
2019-05-13
04 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2019-05-13
04 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot comment]
I support Magnus and Barry's Discuss. I would also like to see at least more text in the security consideration section about potential ...
2019-05-13
04 Mirja Kühlewind Ballot comment text updated for Mirja Kühlewind
2019-05-13
04 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot comment]
I support Magnus and Barry's Discuss. I would also like to see at least more text in the security consideration section about potential ...
2019-05-13
04 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2019-05-13
04 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
The security consideration section have significant short comings as this mechanism enables multiple ways to attack both the packet and the system to ...
2019-05-13
04 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot comment]
Looking at this mechanism it appears to me as something that should fit into a frame work, but that is not explicitly given. ...
2019-05-13
04 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund
2019-05-13
04 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::AD Followup
2019-05-12
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
This should be easy to explain and clear up, but I have to ask, as I don’t see anything about it in the ...
2019-05-12
04 Barry Leiba Ballot discuss text updated for Barry Leiba
2019-05-12
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
This should be easy to explain and clear up, bit I have to ask, as I don’t see anything about it in the ...
2019-05-12
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
In the Introduction, please expand “BLE” on first use.

In “Terminology”, you’re citing RFC 8174, but not usng the new BCP 14 boilerplate ...
2019-05-12
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2019-05-09
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Charlie Kaufman.
2019-05-05
04 Dale Worley Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready with Issues. Reviewer: Dale Worley. Sent review to list.
2019-05-03
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2019-05-03
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2019-05-01
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Dale Worley
2019-05-01
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Dale Worley
2019-05-01
04 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed
2019-04-25
04 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2019-05-16
2019-04-24
04 Suresh Krishnan Ballot has been issued
2019-04-24
04 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2019-04-24
04 Suresh Krishnan Created "Approve" ballot
2019-04-24
04 Suresh Krishnan Ballot writeup was changed
2019-03-08
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2019-03-08
04 (System) IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - Actions Needed
2019-03-08
04 Charles Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-04.txt
2019-03-08
04 (System) New version approved
2019-03-08
04 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "S.V.R Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, Satish Anamalamudi <satishnaidu80@gmail.com>, Malati Hegde <malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, Charles Perkins <charliep@computer.org>
2019-03-08
04 Charles Perkins Uploaded new revision
2019-03-06
03 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup::Revised I-D Needed from Waiting for Writeup
2019-01-29
03 Suresh Krishnan Notification list changed to Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>, Shwetha Bhandari <shwethab@cisco.com> from Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
2019-01-29
03 Suresh Krishnan Document shepherd changed to Shwetha Bhandari
2019-01-07
03 Min Ye Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Dan Frost.
2018-12-27
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Charlie Kaufman.
2018-12-24
03 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2018-12-22
03 Dale Worley Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Issues. Reviewer: Dale Worley. Sent review to list.
2018-12-21
03 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2018-12-21
03 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-03. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us ...
2018-12-13
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Dale Worley
2018-12-13
03 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Dale Worley
2018-12-13
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2018-12-13
03 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2018-12-11
03 Min Ye Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to Dan Frost
2018-12-11
03 Min Ye Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to Dan Frost
2018-12-11
03 Min Ye Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to Adrian Farrel
2018-12-11
03 Min Ye Request for Telechat review by RTGDIR is assigned to Adrian Farrel
2018-12-11
03 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Tianran Zhou
2018-12-11
03 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Tianran Zhou
2018-12-10
03 Alvaro Retana Requested Telechat review by RTGDIR
2018-12-10
03 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2018-12-10
03 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2018-12-24):

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time@ietf.org, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, samitac.ietf@gmail.com, 6lo@ietf.org, Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>, ...
2018-12-10
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2018-12-10
03 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2018-12-09
03 Suresh Krishnan Last call was requested
2018-12-09
03 Suresh Krishnan Last call announcement was generated
2018-12-09
03 Suresh Krishnan Ballot approval text was generated
2018-12-09
03 Suresh Krishnan Ballot writeup was generated
2018-12-09
03 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2018-10-15
03 Lijo Thomas New version available: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-03.txt
2018-10-15
03 (System) New version approved
2018-10-15
03 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "S.V.R Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, Satish Anamalamudi <satishnaidu80@gmail.com>, Malati Hegde <malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, Charles Perkins <charliep@computer.org>
2018-10-15
03 Lijo Thomas Uploaded new revision
2018-09-18
02 Wesley Eddy Request for Early review by IOTDIR Completed: Ready with Issues. Reviewer: Wesley Eddy. Sent review to list.
2018-09-12
02 Ari Keränen Request for Early review by IOTDIR is assigned to Wesley Eddy
2018-09-12
02 Ari Keränen Request for Early review by IOTDIR is assigned to Wesley Eddy
2018-09-06
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2018-09-06
02 Bernie Volz Request for Early review by INTDIR is assigned to Donald Eastlake
2018-09-05
02 Suresh Krishnan Requested Early review by IOTDIR
2018-09-05
02 Suresh Krishnan Requested Early review by INTDIR
2018-09-05
02 Suresh Krishnan IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational,
Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? ...
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational,
Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? ...
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti Responsible AD changed to Suresh Krishnan
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2018-09-03
02 Samita Chakrabarti Changed document writeup
2018-08-31
02 Lijo Thomas New version available: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-02.txt
2018-08-31
02 (System) New version approved
2018-08-31
02 (System)
Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "S.V.R Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, Charles Perkins <charliep@computer.org>, Satish Anamalamudi <satishnaidu80@gmail.com>, Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, Malati Hegde <malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, "P.M. ...
2018-08-31
02 Lijo Thomas Uploaded new revision
2018-06-20
01 Gabriel Montenegro IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2018-05-31
01 Gabriel Montenegro Notification list changed to Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
2018-05-31
01 Gabriel Montenegro Document shepherd changed to Samita Chakrabarti
2018-04-18
01 Gabriel Montenegro IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2018-03-04
01 Charles Perkins New version available: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-01.txt
2018-03-04
01 (System) New version approved
2018-03-04
01 (System)
Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "S.V.R Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, Charles Perkins <charliep@computer.org>, Satish Anamalamudi <satishnaidu80@gmail.com>, Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, Malati Hegde <malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in>, "P.M. ...
2018-03-04
01 Charles Perkins Uploaded new revision
2017-11-14
00 Lijo Thomas New version available: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-00.txt
2017-11-14
00 (System) WG -00 approved
2017-11-14
00 Lijo Thomas Set submitter to "Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>", replaces to (none) and sent approval email to group chairs: 6lo-chairs@ietf.org
2017-11-14
00 Lijo Thomas Uploaded new revision