Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols
draft-housley-implementer-obligations-02

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual in gen area)
Last updated 2015-10-14 (latest revision 2014-05-10)
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state (None)
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Expired (IESG: Dead)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD Jari Arkko
Send notices to (None)
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - No Actions Needed
IANA action state None

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-housley-implementer-obligations-02.txt

Abstract

By choosing to implement an IETF protocol, one is expected to follow the specification, associated best current practices, and IANA registry practices.

Authors

Russ Housley (housley@vigilsec.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)