Protocol Independent Multicast ECMP Assert
draft-hou-pim-ecmp-01

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Vishal Arya  , Yiqun Cai  , Liming Wei  , Sunil Jethwani  , Heidi Ou 
Last updated 2011-11-09 (latest revision 2011-07-08)
Replaced by RFC 6754
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-pim-ecmp
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hou-pim-ecmp-01.txt

Abstract

A PIM router uses RPF procedure to select an upstream interface and router to build forwarding state. When there are equal cost multiple paths (ECMP), existing implementations often use hash algorithms to select a path. Such algorithms do not allow the spread of traffic among the ECMPs according to administrative metrics. This usually leads to inefficient or ineffective use of network resources. This document introduces the ECMP Assert, a mechanism to improve the RPF procedure over ECMPs. It allows ECMP path selection to be based on administratively selected metrics, such as data transmission delays, path preferences and routing metrics.

Authors

Vishal Arya (varya@directv.com)
Yiqun Cai (ycai@cisco.com)
Liming Wei (lwei@cisco.com)
Sunil Jethwani (sjethwani@directv.com)
Heidi Ou (hou@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)