Skip to main content

Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
draft-hollenbeck-epp-rgp-04

Yes

(Ted Hardie)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Thomas Narten)

Recuse

(Scott Hollenbeck)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Ted Hardie Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2004-05-27) Unknown
I cleared the my Discuss - Ted and Scott are writing an RFC Editor note to better
clarify "As with other domains" to tighten the coupling to EPP's mechanims.  My
Discuss note was:

  "As with other domain object updates, redemption of a deleted domain
  object MUST be restricted to the sponsoring client."

The method of accomplishing this is actually left looser than we usually
do in protocols, even though there's a MUST implement mechanism in
RFC 3730 - why isn't a login with SASL actually shown (since this is a MUST
implement as part of 3730), and then there could be alternatives beyond this?
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-05-27) Unknown
Reference:
   [11]  Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", RFC
         2279, January 1998.
Should probably be updated to point to RFC3629 instead of 2279 ??
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2004-05-27) Unknown
Reviewed by Kent Crispin, Gen-ART

This draft is in quite good shape, and I was hard pressed to find 
anything to complain about.  One small nit.  The draft says:

  More detailed information describing the information required to be
  provided in a restore report is available from ICANN.

I spent 5 minutes trying to find that information on the ICANN web
site, and I couldn't find the authoritative description.  It should be
referenced, if it exists.

I don't see this as a reason to hold up publication, however.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse () Unknown