Analysis of Active-Active Connection Solutions
draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Hao Weiguo , Yizhou Li , Susan Hares , Muhammad Durrani , Hongjun Zhai | ||
| Last updated | 2014-11-20 (Latest revision 2014-05-19) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Draft [TRILL-Active-PS] lists basic problems which any active-active solutions should address, these problems include frame duplications, loop, MAC address flip-flop and unsynchronized information among member RBridges. For each problem, there may be multiple ways to deal with it. Some solutions solve all or most of the problems listed, and at the same time introduces extra issues. This draft tries to analyze and compare the different solutions for each of the issues, gives a brief summary on the pros and cons, and/or the applicable scenarios.
Authors
Hao Weiguo
Yizhou Li
Susan Hares
Muhammad Durrani
Hongjun Zhai
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)