Non-Normative Synonyms in RFCs

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Tony Hansen  , Dave Crocker 
Last updated 2016-08-29 (latest revision 2016-02-26)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status Informational
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at


Specifications in RFCs contain normative keywords, as defined in RFC 2119, to signify requirements, permission or prohibitions. These include MUST, SHOULD and MAY, which are commonly recorded in all CAPITALS (but need not be). The RFC 2119 words are sometimes also used with non-normative meaning; this non-normative usage can be confusing and it is better to restrict the RFC 2119 words to be used solely as normative directives. Happily, natural languages permit variation in phrasing, so that meaning can be retained without use of this otherwise-normative vocabulary. For such situations, this document provides some alternatives to the normative vocabulary of RFC 2119.


Tony Hansen (
Dave Crocker (

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)