%% You should probably cite rfc5910 instead of this I-D. @techreport{gould-rfc4310bis-07, number = {draft-gould-rfc4310bis-07}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-rfc4310bis/07/}, author = {Scott Hollenbeck and James Gould}, title = {{Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)}}, pagetotal = 36, year = 2010, month = mar, day = 3, abstract = {This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension mapping for the provisioning and management of Domain Name System security (DNSSEC) extensions for domain names stored in a shared central repository. Specified in XML, this mapping extends the EPP domain name mapping to provide additional features required for the provisioning of DNS security extensions. This document obsoletes RFC 4310. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}}, }