IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability
draft-ginsberg-isis-route-preference-00
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Les Ginsberg , Stephane Litkowski , Stefano Previdi | ||
Last updated | 2015-01-03 (Latest revision 2014-07-02) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-isis-route-preference | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
RTGDIR Early review
by Mike Shand
Has nits
|
||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-isis-route-preference | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Existing specifications as regards route preference are not explicit when applied to IP/IPv6 Extended Reachability TLVs. There are also inconsistencies in the definition of how the up/down bit applies to route preference when the prefix advertisement appears in Level 2 LSPs. This document addresses these issues.
Authors
Les Ginsberg
Stephane Litkowski
Stefano Previdi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)