IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability
draft-ginsberg-isis-route-preference-00
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2015-01-03 (latest revision 2014-07-02) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-isis-route-preference | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-isis-route-preference | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ginsberg-isis-route-preference-00.txt
Abstract
Existing specifications as regards route preference are not explicit when applied to IP/IPv6 Extended Reachability TLVs. There are also inconsistencies in the definition of how the up/down bit applies to route preference when the prefix advertisement appears in Level 2 LSPs. This document addresses these issues.
Authors
Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg@cisco.com)
Stephane Litkowski
(stephane.litkowski@orange.com)
Stefano Previdi
(sprevidi@cisco.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)