Skip to main content

Extensible Authentication Protocol Tunneled Transport Layer Security Authenticated Protocol Version 0 (EAP-TTLSv0)
draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0-05

Yes

(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(David Ward)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)

No Record


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Chris Newman Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2008-04-24) Unknown
  Section 9.2 indicates that AVPs may be sent in the clear in the 
  initial Start packet from the server. Possible uses are indicated
  in the text.  However, it is unclear which AVPs are allowed to
  appear here.

  Joel Halpern suggested in his Gen-ART review an additional sentence
  at the end of the first paragraph of section 11.3: "Multiple
  authentication is only supported by this protocol in conjunction
  with EAP."
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Record
No Record (2008-04-19) Unknown
Any reason why this is going for Informational rather than PS?