Amendments to the Assured Forwarding PHB Group
draft-firoiu-diffserv-af-amend-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Victor Firoiu , Alessio Casati | ||
| Last updated | 1998-11-18 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This note was motivated by the ongoing discussion in the Differentiated Services Working Group regarding the definition of the Assured Forwarding (AF) Per-Hop Behavior (PHB) Group. We consider two issues with the current proposal for AF PHB Group in [Heinanen]: the recommendation for AF discard mechanism, and the definition of AF classes. We discuss the implications of the definitions and recommendations that have raised comments and propose alternative texts.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)