%% You should probably cite draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-01 instead of this revision.
@techreport{fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-00,
    number =    {draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark/00/},
    author =    {Giuseppe Fioccola and Gunter Van de Velde and Mauro Cociglio and Praveen Muley},
    title =     {{Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method in Segment Routing}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2017,
    month =     may,
    day =       22,
    abstract =  {{[}RFC6294{]} makes a survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label. The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is not used in practice. This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used as the passive performance measurement method in a IPv6 domain.},
}