Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method in Segment Routing
draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-04-29 (latest revision 2017-10-26)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark-01.txt

Abstract

[RFC6294] makes a survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label. The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is, according to [RFC6294], not used in practice. This document describes how the alternate marking method can be used as the passive performance measurement method in a IPv6 domain.

Authors

Giuseppe Fioccola (giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it)
Gunter Van de Velde (gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com)
Mauro Cociglio (mauro.cociglio@telecomitalia.it)
Praveen Muley (praveen.muley@nokia.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)