Experimental Values In IPv4, IPv6, ICMPv4, ICMPv6, UDP, and TCP Headers
draft-fenner-iana-exp-2780-05
Yes
(Allison Mankin)
(Jari Arkko)
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
Recuse
(Bill Fenner)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-04-26)
Unknown
Section 10.2 is presumably meant to be "Informative References"
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-05-22)
Unknown
INTRODUCTION, para. 12: > When experimenting with or extending protocols, it is often necessary > to use some sort of protocol number or constant in order to actually > test or experiment with the new function, even when testing in a > closed environment. This document reserves some ranges of numbers > for experimentation purposes in specific protocols where the need to > support experimentation has been identified, and describes the > numbers that have already been reserved by other documents. Instead of "specific protocols", include the list from the title? I didn't read the title at first and the list of protocols isn't anywhere in the text of the document - it may be useful to put the list somewhere in the Introduction, too :-) Section 3.7., para. 1: > This document assignes two values for the Routing Type field in the > IPv6 Routing Header, TBDY and TBDZ. Nit: s/assignes/assigns/ Section 9., para. 3: > When experimental code points are deployed within an administratively > self-contained network domain, the network administrators should > ensure that each code point is used consistently to avoid > interference between experiments. When experimental code points are > used in traffic that crosses multiple adminstrative domains Nit: s/adminstrative/administrative/
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Yes, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown