AAA Protocols : Comparison between RADIUS, DIAMETER and COPS.
draft-ekstein-nasreq-protcomp-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ronnie Ekstein , Oliver Paridaens , Bernard Sales , Yves T'Joens | ||
| Last updated | 2000-01-05 (Latest revision 2000-01-04) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The purpose of this draft is to provide an extensive comparison between the RADIUS, DIAMETER and COPS protocols as these are positioned as generic Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) protocols. The protocols will further be verified on their compliance to the NAS requirements described in [TBA] and roaming requirements described in RFC 2477.
Authors
Ronnie Ekstein
Oliver Paridaens
Bernard Sales
Yves T'Joens
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)