%% You should probably cite rfc9231 instead of this I-D. @techreport{eastlake-rfc6931bis-xmlsec-uris-27, number = {draft-eastlake-rfc6931bis-xmlsec-uris-27}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-rfc6931bis-xmlsec-uris/27/}, author = {Donald E. Eastlake 3rd}, title = {{Additional XML Security Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)}}, pagetotal = 47, year = 2022, month = mar, day = 15, abstract = {This document updates and corrects the IANA "XML Security URIs" registry that lists URIs intended for use with XML digital signatures, encryption, canonicalization, and key management. These URIs identify algorithms and types of information. This document also obsoletes and corrects three errata against RFC 6931.}, }