Comparative Analysis of MTU overhead in the context of SPRING
draft-dukes-spring-mtu-overhead-analysis-01
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Darren Dukes , Clarence Filsfils , Pablo Camarillo | ||
Last updated | 2019-03-25 (Latest revision 2018-09-14) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document provides an apples-to-apples comparative analysis of MTU overhead in the context of SPRING.
Authors
Darren Dukes
Clarence Filsfils
Pablo Camarillo
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)