Handle Resolution Option for ASAP
draft-dreibholz-rserpool-asap-hropt-25
|
| Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (individual)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2019-09-10
|
|
Stream |
|
(None)
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
| Stream |
Stream state |
|
(No stream defined) |
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
RFC Editor Note |
|
(None)
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
Network Working Group T. Dreibholz
Internet-Draft SimulaMet
Intended status: Experimental September 10, 2019
Expires: March 13, 2020
Handle Resolution Option for ASAP
draft-dreibholz-rserpool-asap-hropt-25
Abstract
This document describes the Handle Resolution option for the ASAP
protocol.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 13, 2020.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Dreibholz Expires March 13, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Handle Resolution Option September 2019
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Handle Resolution Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Reference Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Testbed Platform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1. Introduction
Reliable Server Pooling defines protocols for providing highly
available services. The Aggregate Server Access Protocol (ASAP)
provides session management and server selection for applications.
Upon request for a server selection -- denoted as handle resolution
-- an ENRP server returns a list of selected PE identities. The
number of PE identities to be returned is not specified by RSerPool.
Furthermore the ASAP protocol does not contain a way for letting the
requesting instance specify it.
As shown in [Dre2006], [IJAIT2009], [IJHIT2008], selecting too many
entries does not make sense for the application, but on the other
hand also result in significant processing and network overhead.
Furthermore, it has been shown in [LCN2005] that the number of
requested elements is usually 1, but there are application cases
where more PE identities have to be returned. That is, there should
be a possibility to specify the number of requested PE items upon a
handle resolution.
1.1. Scope
The Handle Resolution option defined in this draft simply defines an
option to let the PU-side specify the desired number of PE identities
from the ENRP server.
Dreibholz Expires March 13, 2020 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Handle Resolution Option September 2019
1.2. Terminology
The terms are commonly identified in related work and can be found in
the Aggregate Server Access Protocol and Endpoint Handlespace
Redundancy Protocol Common Parameters document RFC 5354 [RFC5354].
1.3. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Handle Resolution Option
Show full document text