%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional instead of this I-D. @techreport{dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-05, number = {draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-05}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional/05/}, author = {Cheng Li and Haomian Zheng and Stephane Litkowski}, title = {{Extension for Stateful PCE to allow Optional Processing of PCEP Objects}}, pagetotal = 11, year = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.year' **, month = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date' **, day = ** No value found for 'doc.pub_date.day' **, abstract = {This document introduces a mechanism to mark some of the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) objects as optional during PCEP messages exchange for the Stateful PCE model to allow relaxing some constraints. The introduction of relaxation in this document updates RFC8231.}, }