%% You should probably cite draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination-12 instead of this revision.
@techreport{dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination-04,
    number =    {draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination/04/},
    author =    {Dhruv Dhody and Udayasree Palle and Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy},
    title =     {{Supporting explicit inclusion or exclusion of abstract nodes for a subset of P2MP destinations in Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP).}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      2013,
    month =     apr,
    day =       16,
    abstract =  {The ability to determine paths of point-to-multipoint (P2MP) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) is one the key requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE). {[}RFC6006{]} and {[}PCE-P2MP-PROCEDURES{]} describes these mechanisms for intra and inter domain path computation via PCE. This document describes the motivation and PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) extension for explicitly specifying abstract nodes for inclusion or exclusion for a subset of destinations during the Point to Multipoint (P2MP) path computation via PCE.},
}